Review: Ryzen R9 7900, R7 7700 and R5 7600

0

Benchmark AIDA64:

So, for this test which will be done with the AIDA64 software, I’m going to compare the two platforms, AMD and Intel, since I used the same kit at the same frequency and with the same timings.

AIDA has just seen its beta version evolve to 6.32.5659. It can be downloaded directly on the site but in order to benefit from all the results, you will need a license.

AIDA 64:

It is a software capable of providing you with a lot of information about your configuration, but it has the particularity of having a memory benchmark. It will calculate the speed of reading, writing, copying as well as the latency of your memory kit. It is very often used to compare memory kits between them. It is an excellent tool if you want to compare the performance of your memory kit with those we have already had the opportunity to test. The version used for the tests is v6.75.6121 beta, the latest version at the time of starting the tests.

We know that since the launch of Ryzen 7000X and DDR5, there is a “bottleneck” in terms of speed, which is not as good as with Intel. This problem does not really seem to be solvable on the AMD side. So yes, it climbs against the Ryzen 5000 combined with DDR4, but it is far behind what the Alder Lake offers on the Z690 chipset. Some motherboards have options in the BIOS to increase performance by automatically tightening the timings and subtimings.

In writing, the trend is reversed and strangely enough, it is our Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 7 7700X that do the best.

The same is true for copying, where throughputs improve for our non-X Ryzen 7000 and are quite close to the performance of the 7000X versions.

We end on a positive note with a latency that is around 62 n/s. We will not hesitate to come back to the performance in AIDA64 if the next BIOS solve or improve these scores.