Review: Intel Raptor Lake i9-13900K and i5-13600K

0

AIDA64 Benchmark:

So, for this test which will be done with the AIDA64 software, I will compare the two platforms, AMD and Intel, since I used the same kit at the same frequency and with the same timings.

AIDA has just seen its beta version evolve to 6.32.5659. It can be downloaded directly on the site but in order to benefit from all the results, you will need a license.

AIDA 64:

It is a software capable of providing you with a lot of information about your configuration, but it has the particularity of having a memory benchmark. It will calculate the speed of reading, writing, copying as well as the latency of your memory kit. It is very often used to compare memory kits between them. It is an excellent tool if you want to compare the performance of your memory kit with those we have already had the opportunity to test. The version used for the tests is v6.75.6121 beta, the latest version at the time of starting the tests.

We should have great similarities between the 12900K and the 13900K and between the 12600K and the 13600K. This is indeed the case for our first two processors but not at all for the 13600K which shows us “strange” performances. These abnormal performances will be repeated in the graphs below which make us think of a problem with the software. We will do these tests again in a few weeks.

In writing, the observation is perfectly identical with the 12900K and the 13900K which obtain almost the same performances.

The same is true for copying, even if our 13900K shows a slight difference. The scores of our 13600K are still as strange.

We finish on an average note with a latency of 66,7 n/s which is far from being very satisfactory. We will not hesitate to come back to the performances in AIDA64 if the next BIOS solve or improve these scores for both AMD and our i5-13600K.